Quantum Mechanics 10a - Bell's Inequality I
Δημοσιεύτηκε στις 3 Ιαν 2014
1935
was a big year for quantum weirdness. In the previous video we examined
the Schrödinger's cat paradox. Here we look at the EPR (Einstein,
Podolsky, Rosen) paradox. Does quantum mechanics require that "reality"
at one place depend instantaneously on what occurs at another place? Is
reality "non local?"
Part b: http://youtu.be/8UxYKN1q5sI
Comments, including questions, suggestions and constructive criticism are always welcome.
The Quantum Mechanics playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=...
My
development of Bell's inequality was largely motivated by the version
presented in "The Meaning of Quantum Theory" by Jim Baggott, Oxford
Univ. Press, 1992, ISBN 019855575
was a big year for quantum weirdness. In the previous video we examined
the Schrödinger's cat paradox. Here we look at the EPR (Einstein,
Podolsky, Rosen) paradox. Does quantum mechanics require that "reality"
at one place depend instantaneously on what occurs at another place? Is
reality "non local?"
Part b: http://youtu.be/8UxYKN1q5sI
Comments, including questions, suggestions and constructive criticism are always welcome.
The Quantum Mechanics playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=...
My
development of Bell's inequality was largely motivated by the version
presented in "The Meaning of Quantum Theory" by Jim Baggott, Oxford
Univ. Press, 1992, ISBN 019855575
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου